Difference between revisions of "Talk:Alma 20:1-22:26"
From Feast upon the Word (http://feastupontheword.org). Copyright, Feast upon the Word.
m (adding another reference to the same names) |
KurtElieson (Talk | contribs) m (KurtElieson moved page Talk:Alma 20:1-5 to Talk:Alma 20:1-22:26: Regrouping content) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Verse 2 mentions Muloki and Ammah. Does anyone know if we can tell from the scriptures whether these are names of other sons of Mosiah or if these are some of the other people that the sons of Mosiah selected to travel with them [[Alma 17:8]]? Note these two are also mentioned in [[Alma 21:11]]--[[User:Matthewfaulconer|Matthew Faulconer]] 13:49, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC) | Verse 2 mentions Muloki and Ammah. Does anyone know if we can tell from the scriptures whether these are names of other sons of Mosiah or if these are some of the other people that the sons of Mosiah selected to travel with them [[Alma 17:8]]? Note these two are also mentioned in [[Alma 21:11]]--[[User:Matthewfaulconer|Matthew Faulconer]] 13:49, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I would be inclined to think Muloki and Ammah are ''not'' brothers, otherwise I'd expect the verse to read "behold, thy ''brethren'' Aaron, and also Muloki and Ammah are in prison" not "behold, thy ''brother'' Aaron, and also Muloki and Ammah are in prison." --[[User:RobertC|RobertC]] 13:35, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Good point. I hadn't noticed that. Now that you point it out it seems obvious. --[[User:Matthewfaulconer|Matthew Faulconer]] 14:57, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 11:14, 30 October 2015
Verse 2 mentions Muloki and Ammah. Does anyone know if we can tell from the scriptures whether these are names of other sons of Mosiah or if these are some of the other people that the sons of Mosiah selected to travel with them Alma 17:8? Note these two are also mentioned in Alma 21:11--Matthew Faulconer 13:49, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- I would be inclined to think Muloki and Ammah are not brothers, otherwise I'd expect the verse to read "behold, thy brethren Aaron, and also Muloki and Ammah are in prison" not "behold, thy brother Aaron, and also Muloki and Ammah are in prison." --RobertC 13:35, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Good point. I hadn't noticed that. Now that you point it out it seems obvious. --Matthew Faulconer 14:57, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)
