Talk:Alma 32:6-16

Personal comments

Here in these verses I feel to point out just a couple of things. First is that because they felt as though they were considered dross of their brethern this very impression of how there brethern portrayed them caused them to be humble. They were treated as the waste of something very preciuos. The rich Zoramites held themselves to be silver and they considered the poor to be their waste. Going back to how God looks upon the heart of the man and not the outward appreance. Knowing that I think that the spirit was able to show to Alma that their hearts were ready to hear the gospel because of the way that they had been treated. Do we not find the more humble in spirit those that have been despised and rejected of men? It keeps mens hearts from feeling as though they don't need God. Otherwise if all is going well then what are we to look to a higher power for? God gives us trials so that we do remember him. When we go through these trials and we still search for God then he knows that we are humble and ready to hear his word. --Jeff Batt 04:50, 24 Oct 2006 (UTC)

Philosophy versus Faith in Alma 32

Verses 9-11 sound so profoundly Socratic: Alma asserts the Zoramite position, and then he asks questions in order to force them to engage their own claims. It seems quite clear that Alma's purpose in doing so is to help the Zoramites toward a moment of aporia, to show them that there is a paradox underlying their beliefs, if one follows the logic to the conclusion (this is precisely the Socratic elenchus). But what is interesting is that with verse 12, which forms a curious inclusio with verse 8, Alma abandons the Socratic method entirely, and he never comes to the climactic aporia. What on earth is at work here? Is Alma at once trying to draw the Zoramites into thinking about the meaning of faith in the context of engaging a true or false messenger and trying to speak the language of experimentalism, of pragmatism, of logic and philosophy? Is he trying to open the possibility of an experimentalism that confirms one's trust in a messenger so that one develops a very real and vibrant faith (in a messenger)? How do these two worlds collide here? --Joe Spencer 16:13, 15 Jan 2007 (UTC)

I love your point about Alma engaging the humble Zoramites' position in a Socratic way. Yes, I think this opens up different possibilities for reading the later seed-word mataphor. Two more thoughts for now that I want to explore more: (1) The mention of wisdom in these passages seems very significant, esp. in light of the "perfect knowledge" discussed later (this is why I've mentioned that I think "perfect knowledge" should be read with the temple in mind; by the way, I think "perfect knowledge" is a mighty curious term that Alma uses here, and should be considered particularly in light of 2 Ne 9:13ff...). (2) What Alma is really saying about faith in the seed-word section. --RobertC 17:29, 15 Jan 2007 (UTC)

Saying a question in v. 10

Joe, what you wrote is startling to me--in the good sense of startling.

I think the shift from "I say unto you" in v. 10 to "I would ask" in v. 11 is curious. Any thoughts on this, or did you have this explicitly in mind already in what you've already written? I think using the word "say" to pose a question itself creates a kind of tension related to the tension you are describing between the absolute/general and the situational/particular. And I think the parallel usage of "say" and "ask" raises doubled tension between what is said and what is asked.

More tangentially, I wonder if this doesn't have bearing on our recent discussions on speculation. The "ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth" phrase in 2 Tim 3:7 (and, less so, the "endless genealogies, which give rise to mere speculation" phrase in 1 Tim 1:4, NASB translation) makes me think about the circularity problem you've written about in Alma 36 of conversion (which is fundamentally a question of knowledge, per Alma 36:4ff). In Pastoral terms, it seems the questions here that Alma asks are aimed at breaking the endless circle of non-learning that the poor Zoramites are stuck in. --RobertC 17:23, 18 Jan 2007 (UTC)