Talk:2 Ne 25:9-27:35

Prevenient grace

I edited out the reference to Mosiah 5:15 and Hymn 243 since I did not see the relevance to the idea of prevenient grace. I may be missing the relationship, or possibly my explanation was poor and the anonymous poster misunderstood. At any rate, I'm posting what I edited here in hopes that others can help me better represent this viewpoint (perhaps I am too close to the issue to understand the point that was being made):

The alternate meaning of after in Romans and Isaiah ("according to the direction and influence of" does not support that assertion. after starts a prepositional phrase - the object of after is "all we can do", not "grace".

Thus the available alternative is as follows:

"for we know that it is by grace that we are saved, according to the direction and influence of all we can do".

That is plausible for various reasons (grace in the Book of Mormon generally follows works, not the other way around) but it is in opposition to the Arminian / Calvinist scheme of grace driving good works, instead of sustaining good works, which is the classical Mormon perspective - Compare "Let us All Press on" (Hymn #243). Also Mosiah 5:15.

The "classic view" I could probably be expounded upon, but I don't see how the above is addressing the precedence (or causality, or temporality?) of grace in relation to works. That is, I understand the "classic view" to be that works precede grace, whereas Ostler's view is that this verse can be read so that grace precedes works (with the additional clause that it is grace therefore that actually saves us and our works follow from that grace—if such works do not follow, then it is b/c we have not properly accepted that gift of grace to enter into an indwelling relationship with God; cf. James 2:18).

--RobertC 18:00, 2 Jul 2006 (UTC)

--RobertC 18:00, 2 Jul 2006 (UTC)