Difference between revisions of "Talk:Alma 42:1-5"

From Feast upon the Word (http://feastupontheword.org). Copyright, Feast upon the Word.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Note to Ben on posts.)
 
m (fixing username)
Line 1: Line 1:
Hi Ben, thanks for the post. I enjoyed reading it and ended up doing quite a bit of editing. Hopefully you won't think I got too carried away. Well, whether you do or not, I hope you re-edit because I'm still not entirely happy with it.  
+
Hi Bwb2001, thanks for the post. I enjoyed reading it and ended up doing quite a bit of editing. Hopefully you won't think I got too carried away. Well, whether you do or not, I hope you re-edit because I'm still not entirely happy with it.  
  
 
Also I have two questions. 1) I don't think adding a list of quotes without giving any explanation of what they mean really helps the reader much. It seems like if we are going to include such a list they need to be surrounded by some exegesis to belong there. Thoughts? 2) I wasn't really sure what you meant by "Note the conventionally characteristic difference in meaning for the word 'fallen' in this context vs. e.g. traditional Catholic views." Can you explain?
 
Also I have two questions. 1) I don't think adding a list of quotes without giving any explanation of what they mean really helps the reader much. It seems like if we are going to include such a list they need to be surrounded by some exegesis to belong there. Thoughts? 2) I wasn't really sure what you meant by "Note the conventionally characteristic difference in meaning for the word 'fallen' in this context vs. e.g. traditional Catholic views." Can you explain?
  
 
Thanks, --[[User:Matthewfaulconer|Matthew Faulconer]] 07:33, 26 Sep 2005 (CEST)
 
Thanks, --[[User:Matthewfaulconer|Matthew Faulconer]] 07:33, 26 Sep 2005 (CEST)

Revision as of 01:34, 26 September 2005

Hi Bwb2001, thanks for the post. I enjoyed reading it and ended up doing quite a bit of editing. Hopefully you won't think I got too carried away. Well, whether you do or not, I hope you re-edit because I'm still not entirely happy with it.

Also I have two questions. 1) I don't think adding a list of quotes without giving any explanation of what they mean really helps the reader much. It seems like if we are going to include such a list they need to be surrounded by some exegesis to belong there. Thoughts? 2) I wasn't really sure what you meant by "Note the conventionally characteristic difference in meaning for the word 'fallen' in this context vs. e.g. traditional Catholic views." Can you explain?

Thanks, --Matthew Faulconer 07:33, 26 Sep 2005 (CEST)