Difference between revisions of "Gen 2:4-17"

Revision as of 10:07, 2 May 2005

Is verse 7 purely symbolic? Was Adam also a literal son of God, but not born nin the flesh (or in other words mortality)? (See the genealogy of Christ in Luke 3:38, Paul's discussion of the two Adams (or two gods) in Romans 5 and 1 Corinthians 15 especially verses 45-50.)
Could the Father be "responsible" for mortality? Immortality? Or did his two literal or figurative sons have to bear the weight of this repsonsibility?
Why did it take one god (Michael/Adam) to choose bring us into mortality and another God (Christ) to choose to provide immortality? Was there another way to do the same?
How does a correct undestanding of the Fall change our views of the Atonement? Which event was more essential, or could one exist with out the other?
Why do Latter-day Saints study the Fall so much in order to understand the Atonement?

Click the edit link above and to the right to add exegesis

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 |}
 == Questions ==
-* Is verse 7 purely symbolic? Was Adam also a literal son of God, but not born nin the flesh (or in other words mortality)? See the genealogy of Christ in Luke 3:38, Paul's discussion of the two Adams (or two gods) in Rom 5 and 1 Cor 15 (esp :45-50).
+* Is verse 7 purely symbolic? Was Adam also a literal son of God, but not born nin the flesh (or in other words mortality)? (See the genealogy of Christ in [[Luke 3:36-38|Luke 3:38]], Paul's discussion of the two Adams (or two gods) in [[Rom 5:1-5|Romans 5]] and [[1 Cor 15:1-5|1 Corinthians 15]] especially verses [[1 Cor 15:41-45|45-50]].)
 * Could the Father be "responsible" for mortality? Immortality? Or did his two literal or figurative sons have to bear the weight of this repsonsibility?
 * Why did it take one god (Michael/Adam) to choose bring us into mortality and another God (Christ) to choose to provide immortality? Was there another way to do the same?