Difference between revisions of "Gen 41:46-47:26"
KurtElieson (Talk | contribs) m (Moving content to regrouped page) |
KurtElieson (Talk | contribs) m (Updating content formatting) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
''This heading is for more detailed discussions of all or part of a passage. Discussion may include the meaning of a particular word, how a doctrinal point is developed throughout the passage, insights to be developed in the future, and other items. Contributions may range from polished paragraphs down to a single bullet point. The focus, however, should always be on understanding the scriptural text consistent with LDS doctrine. Click the link above and to the right to edit or add content to this heading. →'' | ''This heading is for more detailed discussions of all or part of a passage. Discussion may include the meaning of a particular word, how a doctrinal point is developed throughout the passage, insights to be developed in the future, and other items. Contributions may range from polished paragraphs down to a single bullet point. The focus, however, should always be on understanding the scriptural text consistent with LDS doctrine. Click the link above and to the right to edit or add content to this heading. →'' | ||
| − | = | + | * '''[https://www.lds.org/scriptures/ot/gen/43.32-34?lang=eng#31 Gen 43:32-34]: Shepherds abominable.''' In Flavius Josephus's book, often given the title "Flavius Josephus against Apion" or "Antiquity of the Jews", Josephus makes some noteworthy remarks regarding Egyptian history. In seeking to prove that his people are very ancient, Josephus refers to the works of one of his antagonists, one Manetho, an Egyptian historian very notable for having been able to peruse Egypt's national histories and provide a glimpse of Egypt that the Greeks, the Romans, and others were incapable of offering. Josephus cites Manetho as recounting a tale of how certain Phoenician shepherds known as the ''Hycsos'' invaded the land of Egypt and caused great trouble for a time. While Josephus seeks to connect this group with his own people (and there are striking similarities) it is generally owned that these events were of greater antiquity even than Abraham, the Hycsos being finally expelled, per the footnotes in my copy of the Work of Josephus, about 37 years before Abraham left Haran. While, however, historians agree that the Hycsos can not possibly be the same group as the Israelites, the events do suggest a rather satisfying reason why the Egyptians might culturally consider the keeping of sheep to be an abomination and further, why the Israelites might so easily be made suspect on a national level, falling from the great favor they had from Joseph's service to the Pharaohs. (see: Josephus, Against Apion, 1.14) |
| − | + | ||
| − | In Flavius Josephus's book, often given the title "Flavius Josephus against Apion" or "Antiquity of the Jews", Josephus makes some noteworthy remarks regarding Egyptian history. In seeking to prove that his people are very ancient, Josephus refers to the works of one of his antagonists, one Manetho, an Egyptian historian very notable for having been able to peruse Egypt's national histories and provide a glimpse of Egypt that the Greeks, the Romans, and others were incapable of offering. Josephus cites Manetho as recounting a tale of how certain Phoenician shepherds known as the ''Hycsos'' invaded the land of Egypt and caused great trouble for a time. While Josephus seeks to connect this group with his own people (and there are striking similarities) it is generally owned that these events were of greater antiquity even than Abraham, the Hycsos being finally expelled, per the footnotes in my copy of the Work of Josephus, about 37 years before Abraham left Haran. While, however, historians agree that the Hycsos can not possibly be the same group as the Israelites, the events do suggest a rather satisfying reason why the Egyptians might culturally consider the keeping of sheep to be an abomination and further, why the Israelites might so easily be made suspect on a national level, falling from the great favor they had from Joseph's service to the Pharaohs. (see: Josephus, Against Apion, 1.14) | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
== Points to ponder == | == Points to ponder == | ||
Revision as of 16:25, 14 November 2015
Home > The Old Testament > Genesis > Genesis 36-50 > Chapters 41b-47a
Previous page: Chapters 37-41a Chapters 47b-50
This page would ideally always be under construction. You are invited to contribute.
Summary
This heading should be brief and may include an outline of the passage. Click the link above and to the right to edit or add content to this heading. →
The relationship of Chapters 41b-47a to the rest of the Joseph cycle is discussed at Genesis 36-50.
- 41:46-57: Egyptians pay all their gold for grain in 1st year
- 42:1-38: brothers pay for grain 1st year, Simeon unwilling hostage
- 43:1-14: brothers return to Egypt with Benjamin in 2nd year
- 43:15-34: brothers eat with Joseph
- 44:1-17: Joseph’s cup in Benjamin’s sack, brothers agree to serve Joseph
- 44:18-34: Judah a willing ransom, Joseph revealed
- 45:1-28: Jacob’s family invited to Egypt
- 46:1-47:12: Jacob’s family given resources in Egypt in 2nd year
- 47:13-26: Egyptians pay herds, lands, and themselves for grain in 2nd year
Discussion
This heading is for more detailed discussions of all or part of a passage. Discussion may include the meaning of a particular word, how a doctrinal point is developed throughout the passage, insights to be developed in the future, and other items. Contributions may range from polished paragraphs down to a single bullet point. The focus, however, should always be on understanding the scriptural text consistent with LDS doctrine. Click the link above and to the right to edit or add content to this heading. →
- Gen 43:32-34: Shepherds abominable. In Flavius Josephus's book, often given the title "Flavius Josephus against Apion" or "Antiquity of the Jews", Josephus makes some noteworthy remarks regarding Egyptian history. In seeking to prove that his people are very ancient, Josephus refers to the works of one of his antagonists, one Manetho, an Egyptian historian very notable for having been able to peruse Egypt's national histories and provide a glimpse of Egypt that the Greeks, the Romans, and others were incapable of offering. Josephus cites Manetho as recounting a tale of how certain Phoenician shepherds known as the Hycsos invaded the land of Egypt and caused great trouble for a time. While Josephus seeks to connect this group with his own people (and there are striking similarities) it is generally owned that these events were of greater antiquity even than Abraham, the Hycsos being finally expelled, per the footnotes in my copy of the Work of Josephus, about 37 years before Abraham left Haran. While, however, historians agree that the Hycsos can not possibly be the same group as the Israelites, the events do suggest a rather satisfying reason why the Egyptians might culturally consider the keeping of sheep to be an abomination and further, why the Israelites might so easily be made suspect on a national level, falling from the great favor they had from Joseph's service to the Pharaohs. (see: Josephus, Against Apion, 1.14)
Points to ponder
This heading is for prompts that suggest ways in which all or part of this passage can influence a person's life. Click the link above and to the right to edit or add content to this heading. →
I have a question
This heading is for unanswered questions and is an important part of the continual effort to improve this wiki. Please do not be shy, as even a basic or "stupid" question can identify things that need to be improved on this page. Click the link above and to the right to edit or add content to this heading. →
Resources
This heading is for listing links and print resources, including those cited in the notes. A short comment about the particular strengths of a resource can be helpful. Click the link above and to the right to edit or add content to this heading. →
Notes
Footnotes are not required but are encouraged for factual assertions that average readers cannot easily evaluate for themselves, such as the date of King Solomon’s death or the nuanced definition of a Greek word. In contrast, insights rarely benefit from footnoting, and the focus of this page should always remain on the scriptures themselves rather than what someone has said about them. Links are actively encouraged on all sections of this page, and links to authoritative sources are preferable to footnotes.
