Difference between revisions of "Matt 1:1-5"

From Feast upon the Word (http://feastupontheword.org). Copyright, Feast upon the Word.
Jump to: navigation, search
(Related links)
(Related links)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
* ''Click the edit link above and to the right to add related links''
 
* ''Click the edit link above and to the right to add related links''
  
 +
Julie M Smith has a useful overview concerning the women included in Matthew's genealogy published in Segullah  Spring 2008 (available here[http://segullah.org/spring2008/whythesewomen.php]).
  
 
----
 
----
Line 28: Line 29:
 
|             ||             || [[Matt 1:6-10|Next (Matt 1:6-10)]]
 
|             ||             || [[Matt 1:6-10|Next (Matt 1:6-10)]]
 
|}
 
|}
 
Julie M Smith has a useful overview concerning the women included in Matthew's genealogy published in Segullah  Spring 2008 (available here[http://segullah.org/spring2008/whythesewomen.php]).
 

Revision as of 00:51, 26 September 2009

The New Testament > Matthew > Chapter 1

                        Next (Matt 1:6-10)

Questions

Verses 1-16

It is clear that Matthew is not giving an exact genealogy. For example, he tells us that there were fourteen generations between each of the three important events in Israel’s history—from Abraham, to David, to the Babylonian captivity, to the coming of Christ: three groups of fourteen generations each, culminating in the birth of Christ. But if we compare this genealogy to the other genealogies in the Old Testament we can see that this is incorrect. Why would Matthew knowingly give us a genealogy that isn’t accurate? (Notice that Ezra does something similar: he omits six generations of priests from his genealogy. Compare Ezra 7:1-5 to 1 Chronicles 6:3-15.)

Genealogies in the Bible rarely mention women, but this one mentions three: Tamar (spelled “Thamar” here, verse 3), Rahab (here "Rachab," verse 5), Ruth (verse 5), and Bathsheba, the wife of Uriah (spelled “Urias” here—verse 6). Why would Matthew mention these women? What are the stories about these women? Do those stories have anything to do with the story of Mary and Joseph? If Matthew’s audience is the Jews, why might he include these particular women in the genealogy? (See the lexical notes for verse 6.)

Verse 1

By using the phrase "book of the genealogy," Matthew deliberately imitates passages such as Genesis 2:4 and 5:1. Why? What is he trying to tell us about what follows?

Lexical notes

  • Click the edit link above and to the right to add lexical notes


Exegesis

Click the edit link above and to the right to add exegesis


Related links

  • Click the edit link above and to the right to add related links

Julie M Smith has a useful overview concerning the women included in Matthew's genealogy published in Segullah Spring 2008 (available here[1]).


                        Next (Matt 1:6-10)