Difference between revisions of "Site talk:SS lessons"
(note on TOC error) |
(other Feast blog lesson links?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think the best way to avoid the problem that links in headings are carried into the table of contents is to simply avoid putting links in headings. I agree there is no value to carrying them into the table of contents so the issue really should be changed in Mediawiki. I'll try that.--[[User:Matthewfaulconer|Matthew Faulconer]] 05:46, 7 Feb 2006 (UTC) | I think the best way to avoid the problem that links in headings are carried into the table of contents is to simply avoid putting links in headings. I agree there is no value to carrying them into the table of contents so the issue really should be changed in Mediawiki. I'll try that.--[[User:Matthewfaulconer|Matthew Faulconer]] 05:46, 7 Feb 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Other SS lessons== | ||
| + | Thoughts on whether we should include other links to SS lesson notes on this page? For example, this year's posts on BOM lessons at the Feast blog (or links from ldsgospeldoctrine.net, though I don't think it's worth double posting such links and I think this page is well known anyway, so the work of making extra links doesn't seem worth it, which is why I mainly just have the Feast blog posts in mind as an easy link to discussion to posts which otherwise aren't that organized...). --[[User:RobertC|RobertC]] 18:19, 16 January 2008 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 13:19, 16 January 2008
I think the best way to avoid the problem that links in headings are carried into the table of contents is to simply avoid putting links in headings. I agree there is no value to carrying them into the table of contents so the issue really should be changed in Mediawiki. I'll try that.--Matthew Faulconer 05:46, 7 Feb 2006 (UTC)
Other SS lessons
Thoughts on whether we should include other links to SS lesson notes on this page? For example, this year's posts on BOM lessons at the Feast blog (or links from ldsgospeldoctrine.net, though I don't think it's worth double posting such links and I think this page is well known anyway, so the work of making extra links doesn't seem worth it, which is why I mainly just have the Feast blog posts in mind as an easy link to discussion to posts which otherwise aren't that organized...). --RobertC 18:19, 16 January 2008 (CET)
