Amos 1:1-2:16
Home > The Old Testament > Amos > Chapters 1-2
Previous page: Amos Next page: Chapters 3-5a
- This page would ideally always be under construction. You are invited to contribute.
Contents
Summary[edit]
This heading should be very brief. Click the link above and to the right to edit or add content to this heading. →
Relationship to Amos. The relationship of Chapters 1-2 to the rest of Amos is discussed at Amos.
Story. Chapters 1-2 consist of a series of eight woes, all announced according to the same pattern, upon the nations surrounding and including Israel.
- Amos 1:3-5: Damascus (Syria) for threshing Gilead.
- Amos 1:6-8: Gaza (Philistia) for delivering captivity to Edom.
- Amos 1:9-10: Tyre (Phoenicia) for delivering captivity to Edom.
- Amos 1:11-12: Edom (Esau) for pursuing brother Jacob with the sword.
- Amos 1:13-15: Ammon (Lot) for seeking to conquer Gilead.
- Amos 2:1-3: Moab (Lot) for mistreating Edom.
- Amos 2:4-5: Judah for not keeping the law of the Lord.
- Amos 2:6-16: Israel for social injustice and idolatry despite past blessing.
Message. Themes, symbols, and doctrinal points emphasized in Chapters 1-2 include:
- Israel is not exempt from the justice of God
Discussion[edit]
This section is for detailed discussion such as the meaning of a symbol, how a doctrinal point is developed throughout a passage, or insights that can be further developed in the future. Contributions may range from polished paragraphs down to a single bullet point. The focus, however, should always be on understanding the scriptural text consistent with LDS doctrine. Click the link above and to the right to edit or add content to this heading. →
Amos 1-2[edit]
- Amos 1-2: Outline The first two chapters of Amos consist of eight announcements of punishment, each introduced by the formula: “Thus saith the Lord: For three transgressions of [city] and for four, I will not turn away the punishment thereof, because they have [transgressed], but I will [punish].” There is broad scholarly consensus that each instance of the pattern constitutes a small cohesive unit of the text, and that the eight units together constitute a larger cohesive unit. CITE.
- Woe to: unrelated nations for treatment of Israel (Chapter 1a)
- Woe to: related nations for treatment of Israel (Chapter 1b-2a)
- Woe to: Israel and Judah for breaking the covenant (Chapter 2b)
- The numbers three and four may not be significant as specific quantities, but simply to convey the idea of enough to merit punishment, and yet even more.
- Amos begins by recounting the bad conduct of nations unrelated to Israel and the punishments that will therefore be poured out upon them (1:3-10). An audience in the Northern Kingdom of Israel would likely be receptive to such a message and agree with the underlying principle that guilty nations deserve punishment. But Amos moves steadily closer to home by next talking about nations that are also descended from Abraham (1:11-2:3), about the Southern Kingdom of Judah where Amos lives (2:4-5), and finally about the Northern Kingdom of Israel where he is preaching (2:6-16). But by this point he has already committed his audience to the general principle that guilty nations deserve punishment.
- Another main point of these two chapters is that the Northern Kingdom has in fact committed sins sufficient to cause its destruction. Amos identifies the same specific sins commonly pointed out by other prophets: social injustice and disrespect of the Lord (2:6-16).
Amos 1:1-2: Introduction[edit]
Amos 1:3-10: Woes to Three Foreign Nations[edit]
- Amos 1:3-10. The first three prophecies in Verses 1:3-10 announce punishments to be poured out upon Israel’s three unrelated neighbors to the north and west: the Syrians, the Philistines and the Phoenicians.
- Amos 1:3-5: Woe to Damascus This first prophecy is against the Syrian capitol Damascus (Map). Hazael and Ben-hadad were kings of Syria. A logical target of Syrian expansion is Gilead, the inheritance on the east side of the Jordan River of the Israelite tribes Reuben, Gad and Manasseh (Map). King Hazael of Syria conquered and treated Gilead harshly (2 Kings 10:32-33). The protective gate-bar of Damascus will therefore be broken, and the inhabitants and rulers alike will go into captivity.
- Amos 1:6-8: Woe to Gaza This second prophecy is against Gaza, one of the five principle cities of the Philistines (Map). In fact Amos names all the principal Philistine cities except Gath. The Philistines raided Judah under King Joram and sold the captives to Edom (2 Chronicles 21:16-17). Therefore the Philistines will also perish.
- Amos 1:9-10: Woe to Tyre This third prophecy is against the Phoenician city of Tyre (Map), which also engaged in slave trading and will therefore suffer war.
Amos 1:11-2:3: Woes to Three Related Nations[edit]
- Amos 1:11-2:3. The second set of three prophecies in Amos 1:11-2:3 announces punishments upon Israel’s three related neighbors to the east and southeast: Edom, Ammon and Moab.
- Amos 1:11-12: Woe to Edom The first prophecy in this second set of three is against Edom (Map). Edom descended from Jacob’s brother Esau. Edom maintained a persistent hatred of its brother Jacob. Teman and Bozrah are the two principal cities of Edom. Like Tyre, Edom is threatened with war but not with perishing or captivity.
- Amos 1:13-15: Woe to Ammon The second prophecy in this second set of three is against Ammon (Map). Ammon descended from Abraham’s nephew Lot through the younger of his two daughters. Ammon consistently disputed Israel’s claim to Gilead. This passage indicates that during one invasion of Gilead, Ammon apparently killed both the men and the pregnant women who might give birth to Israelite males. Only the leaders and not the common people are threatened with captivity.
- Amos 2:1-3: Woe to Moab The last prophecy in this second set of three is against Moab (Map). Moab descended from Abraham’s nephew Lot through Lot’s older daughter. Jewish tradition is that after Israel, Judah and Edom jointly attacked Moab (see 2 Kings 3), Moab dug up the bones of an earlier Edomite king and burned them as an intentional desecration and national insult. Therefore Moab will die and its princes will be cut off.
- Amos 2:1: Moab punished for treatment of non-Israelite nation. Foreign nations are usually rebuked by the prophets for their treatment either of Israel or of other nations in general. It is noteworthy that here Moab is instead rebuked for its treatment of Edom.
Amos 2:4-16: Woes to the House of Israel[edit]
- Amos 2:4-16: Judgment against the House of Israel. Prophecies of judgment against other nations usually precede prophecies of Israel’s deliverance. But Amos instead uses his prophecies against other nations to reinforce his prophecies of judgment against Israel. Like the gentile nations, Israel is guilty. And like the gentile nations, it will also be punished.
- Amos 2:4-5: Sins of the Southern Kingdom. The gentile nations are usually rebuked for mistreating Israel. The Israelites, on the other hand, are rebuked for disloyalty to the Lord and for social injustice or mistreatment of fellow Israelites. Here punishment is announced upon the Southern Kingdom of Judah for despising the law of the Lord and not keeping his commandments.
- Amos 2:6-16: Sins of the Northern Kingdom. Finally in this last prophecy Amos arrives at his real target, the Northern Kingdom of Israel. The list of offenses here is much longer than in the previous prophecies. Those previous prophecies were intended in part merely to establish the principle of national punishment for national guilt. But now that Amos is talking to the Northern Kingdom of Israel about the behavior of the Northern Kingdom, it becomes much more important to identify the specific conduct of which the Northern Kingdom needs to repent.
- In the opening verses of this last prophecy (2:6-8) the Northern Kingdom of Israel is accused of mistreating the poor, idolatry, and sexual immorality. Foreign nations will be punished for mistreating the Israelites. The Northern Kingdom will likewise be punished for mistreating its own Israelite citizens, as well as for disloyal idolatry.
- In the middle verses (2:9-11) the Lord recounts his loyalty to Israel, providing both a homeland and divine guidance.
- But in the closing portion of this prophecy Northern Israel is accused of expressly rejecting that divine guidance, telling the prophets not to prophesy and inducing the Nazarites to break their vows (2:12). The homeland will therefore be lost when all its inhabitants are overcome, even the swift and the mighty (2:14-16).
Unanswered questions[edit]
This section is for questions along the lines of "I still don't understand ..." Please do not be shy. The point of these questions is to identify things that still need to be addressed on this page. Click the link above and to the right to edit or add content to this heading. →
Prompts for life application[edit]
This section is for prompts that suggest ways in which a passage can influence a person's life. Prompts may be appropriate either for private self reflection or for a class discussion. Click the link above and to the right to edit or add content to this heading. →
Prompts for further study[edit]
This section is for prompts that invite us to think about a passage more deeply or in a new way. These are not necessarily questions that beg for answers, but rather prompts along the lines of "Have you ever thought about ..." Prompts are most helpful when they are developed individually, thoughtfully, and with enough background information to clearly indicate a particular direction for further study or thought. Click the link above and to the right to edit or add content to this heading. →
Resources[edit]
This section is for listing links and print resources, including those that are also cited elsewhere on this page. A short comment about the particular strengths of a resource can be helpful. Click the link above and to the right to edit or add content to this heading. →
Translations and Lexicons.
- Interlinear text (English-Hebrew), (Hebrew-English)
Other Resources.
Notes[edit]
Footnotes are not required but are encouraged for factual assertions that average readers cannot easily evaluate for themselves (such as the date of King Solomon’s death or the nuanced definition of a Greek word). In contrast, insights rarely benefit from footnoting, and the focus of this page should always remain on the scriptures themselves rather than what someone has said about them. Links are actively encouraged on all sections of this page, and links to authoritative sources (such as Strong's Bible Concordance or the Joseph Smith Papers) are preferable to footnotes.
