Difference between revisions of "Talk:1 Ne 10:17-22"

From Feast upon the Word (http://feastupontheword.org). Copyright, Feast upon the Word.
Jump to: navigation, search
(note to rob on change)
 
(question to all on how to handle links to other scriptures using the same phrase)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Rob, see my change on mysteries of God. Of course, feel free to revise further. --[[User:Matthewfaulconer|Matthew Faulconer]] 05:49, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 
Rob, see my change on mysteries of God. Of course, feel free to revise further. --[[User:Matthewfaulconer|Matthew Faulconer]] 05:49, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 +
 +
----
 +
All, what do you think about putting links to other scriptures that use the same but fairly uncommon phrase that isn't straight forward--as in this case--one eternal round. Do you all think it makes sense to embed these in each of the lexical notes for the verses where the phrase occurs? each of the related links where the phrase occurs? create a separate sub-user page or something and then link from the related links section of each verse to that page? or do something else all together?
 +
 +
I started doing the first one here but it seems like it is the kind of thing we want to be consistent on.
 +
 +
--[[User:Matthewfaulconer|Matthew Faulconer]] 05:02, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:02, 16 November 2005

Rob, see my change on mysteries of God. Of course, feel free to revise further. --Matthew Faulconer 05:49, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)


All, what do you think about putting links to other scriptures that use the same but fairly uncommon phrase that isn't straight forward--as in this case--one eternal round. Do you all think it makes sense to embed these in each of the lexical notes for the verses where the phrase occurs? each of the related links where the phrase occurs? create a separate sub-user page or something and then link from the related links section of each verse to that page? or do something else all together?

I started doing the first one here but it seems like it is the kind of thing we want to be consistent on.

--Matthew Faulconer 05:02, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)