Site talk:SS lessons - Revision history

Rameumptom: What shall we do to include the Come Follow Me program into the Sunday School lessons?

2018-12-25T14:48:48Z

What shall we do to include the Come Follow Me program into the Sunday School lessons?

RobertC: note on section headings for 2010: ldsgospeldoctrine.net links to these!

2010-01-04T02:39:12Z

note on section headings for 2010: ldsgospeldoctrine.net links to these!

RobertC: /* Other SS lessons */ response

2008-01-17T15:34:03Z

‎Other SS lessons: response

Matthewfaulconer: BOM commentary on one page

2008-01-17T07:39:01Z

BOM commentary on one page

Matthewfaulconer: /* Other SS lessons */ response to Robert

2008-01-17T07:24:08Z

‎Other SS lessons: response to Robert

RobertC: /* Other SS lessons */ punctuation typo--can't keep my own wandering parentheticals straight!

2008-01-16T17:20:41Z

‎Other SS lessons: punctuation typo--can't keep my own wandering parentheticals straight!

RobertC: other Feast blog lesson links?

2008-01-16T17:19:49Z

Matthewfaulconer: note on TOC error

2006-02-07T05:46:33Z

note on TOC error

New page

I think the best way to avoid the problem that links in headings are carried into the table of contents is to simply avoid putting links in headings. I agree there is no value to carrying them into the table of contents so the issue really should be changed in Mediawiki. I'll try that.--[[User:Matthewfaulconer|Matthew Faulconer]] 05:46, 7 Feb 2006 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:48, 25 December 2018
Line 14:		Line 14:
	==Update on OT links==		==Update on OT links==
	Kurt Neumiller is planning to post links to these lesson sections from his [http://www.ldsgospeldoctrine.net/ site] (OT 2010). If we ever change the section headings on this page, it will likely mess up the links from his site.... --[[User:RobertC\|RobertC]] 03:39, 4 January 2010 (CET)		Kurt Neumiller is planning to post links to these lesson sections from his [http://www.ldsgospeldoctrine.net/ site] (OT 2010). If we ever change the section headings on this page, it will likely mess up the links from his site.... --[[User:RobertC\|RobertC]] 03:39, 4 January 2010 (CET)
		+
		+	==Come Follow Me New Testament Lessons==
		+	Matthew, since the program has changed, including lesson schedule, etc., should we add a Come Follow Me NT to the Sunday School lessons page?
		+	Gerald Smith 25 Dec 2019 (and Merry Christmas).

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:39, 4 January 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:

	I just finished (unless I messed something up) the pages which show all commentary on one page for each of the Book of Mormon lessons. Let me know if anything didn't work out quite right. I'll be adding links to all of these on the main SS lessons page hopefully pretty soon. --[[User:Matthewfaulconer\|Matthew Faulconer]] 08:39, 17 January 2008 (CET)		I just finished (unless I messed something up) the pages which show all commentary on one page for each of the Book of Mormon lessons. Let me know if anything didn't work out quite right. I'll be adding links to all of these on the main SS lessons page hopefully pretty soon. --[[User:Matthewfaulconer\|Matthew Faulconer]] 08:39, 17 January 2008 (CET)
		+
		+	==Update on OT links==
		+	Kurt Neumiller is planning to post links to these lesson sections from his [http://www.ldsgospeldoctrine.net/ site] (OT 2010). If we ever change the section headings on this page, it will likely mess up the links from his site.... --[[User:RobertC\|RobertC]] 03:39, 4 January 2010 (CET)

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Robert I don't think I'm totally following what you are saying in the last sentence. I agree it doesn't make sense to try to replicate the ldsgospeldoctrine.net. I do think this page may be the easiest way to create a sort of index to the sunday school posts on the Feast blog--something that you can't easily get to just by clicking on the sunday school category there. Also maybe if we ask ldsgospeldoctrine.net to include a few more links to the feast blog or the wiki commentary and that site agrees, then maybe there is less need for this page. --[[User:Matthewfaulconer|Matthew Faulconer]] 08:24, 17 January 2008 (CET)
 == BOM commentary on one page ==
 I just finished (unless I messed something up) the pages which show all commentary on one page for each of the Book of Mormon lessons. Let me know if anything didn't work out quite right. I'll be adding links to all of these on the main SS lessons page hopefully pretty soon. --[[User:Matthewfaulconer|Matthew Faulconer]] 08:39, 17 January 2008 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:39, 17 January 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Robert I don't think I'm totally following what you are saying in the last sentence. I agree it doesn't make sense to try to replicate the ldsgospeldoctrine.net. I do think this page may be the easiest way to create a sort of index to the sunday school posts on the Feast blog--something that you can't easily get to just by clicking on the sunday school category there. Also maybe if we ask ldsgospeldoctrine.net to include a few more links to the feast blog or the wiki commentary and that site agrees, then maybe there is less need for this page. --[[User:Matthewfaulconer\|Matthew Faulconer]] 08:24, 17 January 2008 (CET)		Robert I don't think I'm totally following what you are saying in the last sentence. I agree it doesn't make sense to try to replicate the ldsgospeldoctrine.net. I do think this page may be the easiest way to create a sort of index to the sunday school posts on the Feast blog--something that you can't easily get to just by clicking on the sunday school category there. Also maybe if we ask ldsgospeldoctrine.net to include a few more links to the feast blog or the wiki commentary and that site agrees, then maybe there is less need for this page. --[[User:Matthewfaulconer\|Matthew Faulconer]] 08:24, 17 January 2008 (CET)
		+
		+	== BOM commentary on one page ==
		+
		+	I just finished (unless I messed something up) the pages which show all commentary on one page for each of the Book of Mormon lessons. Let me know if anything didn't work out quite right. I'll be adding links to all of these on the main SS lessons page hopefully pretty soon. --[[User:Matthewfaulconer\|Matthew Faulconer]] 08:39, 17 January 2008 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:24, 17 January 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:
	==Other SS lessons==		==Other SS lessons==
	Thoughts on whether we should include other links to SS lesson notes on this page? For example, this year's posts on BOM lessons at the Feast blog (or links from ldsgospeldoctrine.net, though I don't think it's worth double posting such links and I think this page is well known anyway, so the work of making extra links doesn't seem worth it, which is why I mainly just have the Feast blog posts in mind as an easy link to discussion to posts which otherwise aren't that organized...)? --[[User:RobertC\|RobertC]] 18:19, 16 January 2008 (CET)		Thoughts on whether we should include other links to SS lesson notes on this page? For example, this year's posts on BOM lessons at the Feast blog (or links from ldsgospeldoctrine.net, though I don't think it's worth double posting such links and I think this page is well known anyway, so the work of making extra links doesn't seem worth it, which is why I mainly just have the Feast blog posts in mind as an easy link to discussion to posts which otherwise aren't that organized...)? --[[User:RobertC\|RobertC]] 18:19, 16 January 2008 (CET)
		+
		+	Robert I don't think I'm totally following what you are saying in the last sentence. I agree it doesn't make sense to try to replicate the ldsgospeldoctrine.net. I do think this page may be the easiest way to create a sort of index to the sunday school posts on the Feast blog--something that you can't easily get to just by clicking on the sunday school category there. Also maybe if we ask ldsgospeldoctrine.net to include a few more links to the feast blog or the wiki commentary and that site agrees, then maybe there is less need for this page. --[[User:Matthewfaulconer\|Matthew Faulconer]] 08:24, 17 January 2008 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:20, 16 January 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:

	==Other SS lessons==		==Other SS lessons==
−	Thoughts on whether we should include other links to SS lesson notes on this page? For example, this year's posts on BOM lessons at the Feast blog (or links from ldsgospeldoctrine.net, though I don't think it's worth double posting such links and I think this page is well known anyway, so the work of making extra links doesn't seem worth it, which is why I mainly just have the Feast blog posts in mind as an easy link to discussion to posts which otherwise aren't that organized...). --[[User:RobertC\|RobertC]] 18:19, 16 January 2008 (CET)	+	Thoughts on whether we should include other links to SS lesson notes on this page? For example, this year's posts on BOM lessons at the Feast blog (or links from ldsgospeldoctrine.net, though I don't think it's worth double posting such links and I think this page is well known anyway, so the work of making extra links doesn't seem worth it, which is why I mainly just have the Feast blog posts in mind as an easy link to discussion to posts which otherwise aren't that organized...)? --[[User:RobertC\|RobertC]] 18:19, 16 January 2008 (CET)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:19, 16 January 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think the best way to avoid the problem that links in headings are carried into the table of contents is to simply avoid putting links in headings. I agree there is no value to carrying them into the table of contents so the issue really should be changed in Mediawiki. I'll try that.--[[User:Matthewfaulconer\|Matthew Faulconer]] 05:46, 7 Feb 2006 (UTC)		I think the best way to avoid the problem that links in headings are carried into the table of contents is to simply avoid putting links in headings. I agree there is no value to carrying them into the table of contents so the issue really should be changed in Mediawiki. I'll try that.--[[User:Matthewfaulconer\|Matthew Faulconer]] 05:46, 7 Feb 2006 (UTC)
		+
		+	==Other SS lessons==
		+	Thoughts on whether we should include other links to SS lesson notes on this page? For example, this year's posts on BOM lessons at the Feast blog (or links from ldsgospeldoctrine.net, though I don't think it's worth double posting such links and I think this page is well known anyway, so the work of making extra links doesn't seem worth it, which is why I mainly just have the Feast blog posts in mind as an easy link to discussion to posts which otherwise aren't that organized...). --[[User:RobertC\|RobertC]] 18:19, 16 January 2008 (CET)