Alma 18:21-25

2007-01-08T17:44:17Z

72.25.123.44: /* Questions */

[[The Book of Mormon]] > [[Alma]] > [[Alma 18|Chapter 18]]
{|
| [[Alma 18:16-20|Previous (Alma 18:16-20)]] ||             || [[Alma 18:26-30|Next (Alma 18:26-30)]]
|}
== Questions ==
* ''Click the edit link above and to the right to add questions''
In verse 23, even though Ammon is doing a good thing (teaching the gospel), it sounds like he's doing it in a bad way, i.e., using guile. Can GUILE be a good thing to have? In [[John 1:47]] it seems a good thing that Nathanael had no guile.

== Lexical notes ==
* ''Click the edit link above and to the right to add lexical notes''

== Exegesis ==
''Click the edit link above and to the right to add exegesis''

== Related links ==
* ''Click the edit link above and to the right to add related links''

----
{|
| [[Alma 18:16-20|Previous (Alma 18:16-20)]] ||             || [[Alma 18:26-30|Next (Alma 18:26-30)]]
|}

John 1:46-51

2007-01-08T17:38:49Z

72.25.123.44: /* Questions */

[[The New Testament]] > [[John]] > [[John 1|Chapter 1]]
{|
| [[John 1:41-45|Previous (John 1:41-45)]] ||             || [[John 2:1-5|Next (John 2:1-5)]]
|}
== Questions ==
* In verse 47 it sounds like GUILE is a negative thing which Nathanael was free of, and yet in verse 46 it sounds like Nathanael was critical of the town of Nazareth and anybody who came from there. Still in [[Alma 18:23]], it sounds like Ammon's catching Lamoni "with guile" is a bad thing, yet he's doing a good thing in teaching him the gospel. How is GUILE being using here as it applies to Nathanael?

== Lexical notes ==
* ''Click the edit link above and to the right to add lexical notes''

== Exegesis ==
''Click the edit link above and to the right to add exegesis''

== Related links ==
* ''Click the edit link above and to the right to add related links''

----
{|
| [[John 1:41-45|Previous (John 1:41-45)]] ||             || [[John 2:1-5|Next (John 2:1-5)]]
|}

Feast upon the Word - User contributions [en]

Alma 18:21-25

John 1:46-51